Quadro K2000M vs Radeon HD 6550A
In this comparison between Quadro K2000M and Radeon HD 6550A you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 6550A will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 6550A
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K2000M | Radeon HD 6550A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K2000M has 57% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 6550A.
- Both video cards are using MXM-A (3.0) interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro K2000M and Radeon HD 6550A have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Quadro K2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 6550A - in Desktops.
- Quadro K2000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 6550A - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 195 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6550A.
- Quadro K2000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6550A - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 200 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6550A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6550A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 189% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Fortnite is 136% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Minecraft is 69% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | − |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in World of Tanks is 96% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K2000M | Radeon HD 6550A | |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | N14P-Q3 | Pinewood |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 June 2012 | 7 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 550 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 627 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.84 | 13.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 572.2 gflops | 624.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |