Radeon HD 6550A vs Radeon R7 360

In this comparison between Radeon HD 6550A and Radeon R7 360 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon HD 6550A will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 360 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Main Specs

  Radeon HD 6550A Radeon R7 360
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 100 Watt
Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors 1 x 6-pin
Memory type GDDR3 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
  Check Price
  • Radeon R7 360 has 185% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 6550A.
  • Radeon HD 6550A is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 360 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
  • Radeon HD 6550A and Radeon R7 360 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • Radeon HD 6550A is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon R7 360 - with GCN 2.0.
  • Radeon HD 6550A is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 360 - by 28 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 360 is 4400 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6550A.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 0−1 16−18
ultra / 1080p 9−10
QHD / 1440p 0−1 4−5
4K / 2160p 4−5
low / 720p 1−2 30−35
medium / 1080p 0−1 20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 360 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than Radeon HD 6550A.

Full Specs

  Radeon HD 6550A Radeon R7 360
Architecture TeraScale 2 GCN 2.0
Code name Pinewood Tobago
Type Desktop Desktop
Release date 7 February 2011 18 June 2015
Pipelines 480 768
Core clock speed 550 MHz
Boost Clock 1000 MHz
Transistor count 627 million 2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 13.20 50.40
Floating-point performance 624.0 gflops 1,613 gflops
Length 165 mm
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz 6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth 25.6 GB/s 112 GB/s
DirectX 11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model 5.0 6.3
OpenGL 4.4 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 2.0
Vulkan N/A +
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.2 kh/s
FreeSync +
Bus support PCIe 3.0
HDMI +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 225 Mh/s
Eyefinity +
PowerTune +
TrueAudio +
Mantle +
Design reference
Bridgeless CrossFire +
Number of Eyefinity displays 6
DisplayPort support +
CrossFire +
VCE +
DDMA audio +
Decred / DCR (Decred) 0.29 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 10 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 102 Sol/s
  Check Price