Radeon HD 6550A vs Radeon R7 Carrizo
When comparing Radeon HD 6550A and Radeon R7 Carrizo, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon HD 6550A and Radeon R7 Carrizo is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon HD 6550A
Radeon R7 Carrizo is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 Carrizo is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 Carrizo here:
Main Specs
| Radeon HD 6550A | Radeon R7 Carrizo | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 12-35 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 6550A has 191% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 Carrizo.
- Radeon HD 6550A is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 Carrizo - in Laptops.
- Radeon HD 6550A is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon R7 Carrizo - with GCN 1.2/2.0.
- Radeon HD 6550A is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 Carrizo - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 Carrizo in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6550A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 Carrizo in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 182% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6550A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 Carrizo in Dota 2 is 113% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 Carrizo in Fortnite is 159% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 Carrizo in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 Carrizo in Minecraft is 45% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 Carrizo in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 768p | − | 10−12 |
| high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 Carrizo in World of Tanks is 84% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon HD 6550A | Radeon R7 Carrizo | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.2/2.0 |
| Code name | Pinewood | Carrizo |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 7 February 2011 | 4 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 800 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 627 million | 2410 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.20 | |
| Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |