GeForce GTX 465 vs Radeon HD 6750

In this comparison between GeForce GTX 465 and Radeon HD 6750 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 465 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 6750 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTX 465 Check Price

Radeon HD 6750 Check Price

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 465	Radeon HD 6750
Power consumption (TDP)	200 Watt	86 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	Two 6-pins	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 465 has 132% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 6750.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GeForce GTX 465 and Radeon HD 6750 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 465 is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon HD 6750 - with TeraScale 2.
GeForce GTX 465 and Radeon HD 6750 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Radeon HD 6750 is 161 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 465.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 553 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6750.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	1−2
ultra / 1080p	8−9	0−1
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−33	12−14
medium / 1080p	18−20	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	20−22	4−5
QHD / 1440p	6−7	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	50−55	16−18
medium / 1080p	24−27	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Battlefield 5 is 266% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GeForce GTX 465 and Radeon HD 6750 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	200−210	120−130
medium / 768p	170−180	90−95
ultra / 1080p	95−100	40−45
QHD / 1440p	50−55	24−27
4K / 2160p	30−33	18−20
high / 768p	130−140	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 87% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
low / 768p	55−60	85−90
ultra / 1080p	35−40	16−18
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6750 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	100−110	75−80
medium / 768p	90−95	50−55
ultra / 1080p	60−65	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Dota 2 is 68% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
high / 1080p	16−18	2−3
ultra / 1080p	14−16	2−3
4K / 2160p	6−7	1−2
low / 720p	35−40	12−14
medium / 1080p	18−20	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
high / 1080p	24−27	10−11
ultra / 1080p	18−20	5−6
QHD / 1440p	16−18	2−3
low / 720p	95−100	50−55
medium / 1080p	50−55	10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Fortnite is 162% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
high / 1080p	24−27	4−5
ultra / 1080p	18−20	−
QHD / 1440p	8−9	0−1
low / 720p	50−55	18−20
medium / 1080p	27−30	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
low / 768p	80−85	45−50
medium / 768p	70−75	−
high / 1080p	27−30	5−6
ultra / 1080p	12−14	2−3
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
high / 1080p	9−10	1−2
ultra / 1080p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	5−6
medium / 1080p	12−14	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
low / 768p	110−120	90−95
high / 1080p	−	85−90
ultra / 1080p	100−110	70−75
medium / 1080p	100−110	90−95
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Minecraft is 27% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
low / 720p	55−60	27−30
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	6−7
medium / 1080p	16−18	−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 280% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
low / 768p	50−55	12−14
medium / 768p	30−35	9−10
high / 1080p	18−20	4−5
ultra / 1080p	10−11	3−4
4K / 2160p	8−9	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
low / 768p	100−110	75−80
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	30−35	16−18
high / 768p	50−55	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Radeon HD 6750.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 465	Radeon HD 6750
Architecture	Fermi	TeraScale 2
Code name	GF100	Juniper
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	31 May 2010	21 January 2011
Pipelines	352	720
Core clock speed	1215 MHz
Boost Clock		900 MHz
Transistor count	3,100 million	1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	26.7 billion/sec	25.20
Floating-point performance	855.4 gflops	1,008.0 gflops
Length	9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)	170 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1603 MHz (3206 data rate)	1050 MHz
Memory bandwidth	102.6 GB/s	73.6 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.2	4.4
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A
CUDA	+
CUDA cores	352
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0 x 16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options	+
Multi monitor support	+
HDMI	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	64 Mh/s	92 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
Design		reference
CrossFire		+
Compute performance	30x
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 465 vs Radeon HD 6750

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares