GRID K240Q vs Radeon HD 6770
In this comparison between GRID K240Q and Radeon HD 6770 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K240Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 6770 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K240Q
Main Specs
GRID K240Q
Radeon HD 6770
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
108 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
1 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
GRID K240Q has 108% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 6770.
GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 6770 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
GRID K240Q and Radeon HD 6770 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 6770 - with TeraScale 2.
GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6770 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3950 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6770.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−11
3−4
ultra / 1080p
6−7
1−2
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
14−16
medium / 1080p
12−14
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Radeon HD 6770.
high / 1080p
16−18
7−8
ultra / 1080p
14−16
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
20−22
medium / 1080p
18−20
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 120% more, than Radeon HD 6770.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GRID K240Q and Radeon HD 6770 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
170−180
120−130
medium / 768p
140−150
95−100
ultra / 1080p
75−80
45−50
QHD / 1440p
40−45
24−27
4K / 2160p
30−33
−
high / 768p
110−120
70−75
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than Radeon HD 6770.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
27−30
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6770 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p
95−100
75−80
medium / 768p
75−80
55−60
ultra / 1080p
45−50
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 37% more, than Radeon HD 6770.
high / 1080p
12−14
4−5
ultra / 1080p
10−12
3−4
4K / 2160p
4−5
1−2
low / 720p
27−30
14−16
medium / 1080p
12−14
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than Radeon HD 6770.
high / 1080p
18−20
12−14
ultra / 1080p
14−16
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
4−5
low / 720p
75−80
55−60
medium / 1080p
35−40
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 60% more, than Radeon HD 6770.
high / 1080p
18−20
7−8
ultra / 1080p
14−16
6−7
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
21−24
medium / 1080p
21−24
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 109% more, than Radeon HD 6770.
low / 768p
65−70
45−50
medium / 768p
60−65
−
high / 1080p
20−22
9−10
ultra / 1080p
9−10
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 60% more, than Radeon HD 6770.
high / 1080p
7−8
2−3
ultra / 1080p
5−6
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
8−9
medium / 1080p
9−10
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 140% more, than Radeon HD 6770.
low / 768p
100−110
85−90
high / 1080p
−
65−70
ultra / 1080p
90−95
−
medium / 1080p
100−105
−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon HD 6770.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
40−45
27−30
medium / 1080p
20−22
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Radeon HD 6770.
high / 1080p
12−14
6−7
ultra / 1080p
8−9
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
7−8
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 133% more, than Radeon HD 6770.
low / 768p
35−40
18−20
medium / 768p
24−27
12−14
high / 1080p
12−14
6−7
ultra / 1080p
8−9
4−5
4K / 2160p
7−8
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 125% more, than Radeon HD 6770.
low / 768p
90−95
70−75
medium / 768p
50−55
35−40
ultra / 1080p
27−30
16−18
high / 768p
45−50
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 41% more, than Radeon HD 6770.
Full Specs
GRID K240Q
Radeon HD 6770
Architecture
Kepler
TeraScale 2
Code name
GK104
Juniper
Type
Workstation
Desktop
Release date
28 June 2013
21 January 2011
Pipelines
1536
800
Core clock speed
745 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
95.36
34.00
Floating-point performance
2,289 gflops
1,360.0 gflops
Length
198 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
1050 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
76.8 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.4
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
Bus support
PCIe 2.0 x16
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
118 Mh/s
Eyefinity
+
Design
reference
CrossFire
+
Check Price
