FirePro S9000 vs Radeon HD 6850M
When choosing between FirePro S9000 and Radeon HD 6850M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S9000 and Radeon HD 6850M.
FirePro S9000
Radeon HD 6850M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6850M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6850M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | Radeon HD 6850M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 600% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 6850M.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 6850M uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro S9000 has 5 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 6850M.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6850M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 6850M - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 325 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6850M.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6850M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 4700 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6850M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 787% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S9000 and Radeon HD 6850M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 179% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
FirePro S9000 and Radeon HD 6850M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 134% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 840% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 443% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 680% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 46% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 10−12 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1116% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | Radeon HD 6850M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Terascale 2 |
Code name | Tahiti | Granville Pro/LP |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 6 January 2011 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 575 / 675 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,040 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 27.00 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 1,080.0 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |