GRID K520 vs Radeon HD 6850M
When comparing GRID K520 and Radeon HD 6850M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K520 and Radeon HD 6850M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K520
Radeon HD 6850M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6850M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6850M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K520 | Radeon HD 6850M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 350% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 6850M.
- GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 6850M uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K520 has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 6850M.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6850M - in Laptops.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 6850M - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 170 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6850M.
- GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6850M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 4200 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6850M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 283% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 350% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6850M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 100% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 89% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 320% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 187% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 290% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 155% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 320% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 450% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K520 | Radeon HD 6850M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Terascale 2 |
| Code name | GK104 | Granville Pro/LP |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 6 January 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 800 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 575 / 675 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,040 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 27.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 1,080.0 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |