Radeon HD 6850M vs Tesla M2070 Q
In this comparison between Radeon HD 6850M and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon HD 6850M will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M2070 Q
Radeon HD 6850M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6850M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6850M here:
Main Specs
Radeon HD 6850M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 350% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 6850M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 5 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 6850M.
- Radeon HD 6850M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 6850M is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 6850M is 1 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Radeon HD 6850M and Tesla M2070 Q are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 2332 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6850M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6850M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
Radeon HD 6850M and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Far Cry 5 is 20% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Fortnite is 31% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Minecraft is 3% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
low / 768p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 83% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 6850M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Terascale 2 | Fermi |
Code name | Granville Pro/LP | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 6 January 2011 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 800 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 575 / 675 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.00 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,080.0 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |