FirePro M4150 vs Radeon HD 6950M
In this comparison between FirePro M4150 and Radeon HD 6950M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4150 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 6950M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M4150
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon HD 6950M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6950M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6950M here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4150 | Radeon HD 6950M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon HD 6950M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon HD 6950M has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6950M - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 6950M - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 135 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6950M.
- FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6950M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 3100 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6950M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro M4150 and Radeon HD 6950M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Dota 2 is 35% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Fortnite is 73% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Forza Horizon 4 is 88% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Grand Theft Auto V is 61% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Metro Exodus is 233% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Minecraft is 14% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 220% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in World of Tanks is 33% more, than FirePro M4150. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4150 | Radeon HD 6950M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Terascale 2 |
Code name | Opal | Blackcomb Pro |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 16 October 2013 | 6 January 2011 |
Pipelines | 384 | 960 |
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 580 MHz |
Transistor count | 950 million | 1,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 27.84 |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 1,113.6 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |