GRID K520 vs Radeon HD 6950M
When comparing GRID K520 and Radeon HD 6950M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K520 and Radeon HD 6950M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K520
Radeon HD 6950M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6950M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6950M here:
Main Specs
GRID K520 | Radeon HD 6950M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 350% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 6950M.
- GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 6950M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GRID K520 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 6950M.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6950M - in Laptops.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 6950M - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 165 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6950M.
- GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6950M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 4100 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6950M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 81% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 73% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K520 and Radeon HD 6950M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 44% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 43% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 60% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 87% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 61% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. |
Full Specs
GRID K520 | Radeon HD 6950M | |
Architecture | Kepler | Terascale 2 |
Code name | GK104 | Blackcomb Pro |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | 6 January 2011 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 960 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 580 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 27.84 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 1,113.6 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |