Radeon HD 6950M vs Tesla M2070 Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon HD 6950M and Tesla M2070 Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon HD 6950M stacks up against Tesla M2070 Q, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M2070 Q
Radeon HD 6950M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6950M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6950M here:
Main Specs
| Radeon HD 6950M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 350% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 6950M.
- Radeon HD 6950M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 6950M.
- Radeon HD 6950M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 6950M is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 6950M is 6 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Radeon HD 6950M and Tesla M2070 Q are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 2232 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6950M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Battlefield 5 is 72% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Fortnite is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Forza Horizon 4 is 58% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Minecraft is 21% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 71% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 77% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon HD 6950M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | Fermi |
| Code name | Blackcomb Pro | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 6 January 2011 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 960 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 580 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,700 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.84 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,113.6 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |