FirePro M4150 vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
In this comparison between FirePro M4150 and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4150 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M4150
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4150 | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2x2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 35 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
- FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 3100 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Battlefield 5 is 411% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro M4150 and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 95−100 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 146% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Dota 2 is 116% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Fortnite is 237% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Forza Horizon 4 is 414% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Minecraft is 33% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 580% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in World of Tanks is 61% more, than FirePro M4150. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4150 | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Terascale 2 |
Code name | Opal | Blackcomb XT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 16 October 2013 | 6 January 2011 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1920 |
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 680 MHz |
Transistor count | 950 million | 2x1700 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 | |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro M4150 vs Radeon HD 7690M XT
- FirePro M4150 vs GeForce 830A
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs Radeon HD 7690M XT
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs GeForce 830A
- FirePro M4150 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- FirePro M4150 vs FirePro S9050
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs FirePro S9050