FireStream 9250 vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9250 and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9250 and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9250
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2x2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is 55 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 1086 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Battlefield 5 is 366% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9250 and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 95−100 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 124% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Dota 2 is 100% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Far Cry 5 is 440% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Fortnite is 217% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Forza Horizon 4 is 309% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Grand Theft Auto V is 157% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Minecraft is 43% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 283% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 325% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in World of Tanks is 46% more, than FireStream 9250. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Terascale 2 |
Code name | RV770 | Blackcomb XT |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 6 January 2011 |
Pipelines | 800 | 1920 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 680 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | 2x1700 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 4.1 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 650M
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 640
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs GeForce GT 650M
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs GeForce GT 640
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- FireStream 9250 vs FirePro S9050
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs FirePro S9050