GRID K140Q vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
When choosing between GRID K140Q and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K140Q and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
GRID K140Q
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire here:
Main Specs
| GRID K140Q | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2x2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- GRID K140Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - in Laptops.
- GRID K140Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of GRID K140Q is 170 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
- GRID K140Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K140Q is 882 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 580% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Battlefield 5 is 1050% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K140Q and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 120−130 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 95−100 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 170−180 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 187% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Dota 2 is 166% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Far Cry 5 is 900% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Fortnite is 345% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Forza Horizon 4 is 714% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Grand Theft Auto V is 183% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Minecraft is 43% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 4100% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2450% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in World of Tanks is 85% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K140Q | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Terascale 2 |
| Code name | GK107 | Blackcomb XT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 6 January 2011 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1920 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 680 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 2x1700 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |