Quadro 2000D vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
When comparing Quadro 2000D and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 2000D and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 2000D
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire here:
Main Specs
Quadro 2000D | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2x2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI | |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - in Laptops.
- Quadro 2000D is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is 55 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 1700 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Battlefield 5 is 411% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro 2000D and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 95−100 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 146% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Dota 2 is 116% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Fortnite is 237% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Forza Horizon 4 is 414% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Minecraft is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 580% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in World of Tanks is 61% more, than Quadro 2000D. |
Full Specs
Quadro 2000D | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | |
Architecture | Fermi | Terascale 2 |
Code name | GF106 | Blackcomb XT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 5 October 2011 | 6 January 2011 |
Pipelines | 192 | 1920 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 680 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 2x1700 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 20.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | |
Length | 178 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro 2000D vs HD Graphics 530
- Quadro 2000D vs GeForce 830M
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs HD Graphics 530
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs GeForce 830M
- Quadro 2000D vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Quadro 2000D vs FirePro S9050
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs FirePro S9050