Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro FX 4800
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire here:
Main Specs
Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 2x2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1534 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
- Quadro FX 4800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - in Laptops.
- Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is 78 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro FX 4800 is 700 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Battlefield 5 is 475% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 95−100 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 146% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Dota 2 is 116% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Fortnite is 237% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Forza Horizon 4 is 414% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Minecraft is 33% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 580% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Quadro FX 4800. |
Full Specs
Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Terascale 2 |
Code name | GT200B | Blackcomb XT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 11 November 2008 | 6 January 2011 |
Pipelines | 192 | 1920 |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 680 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 2x1700 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro FX 4800 vs GeForce 830M
- Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon E6760
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs GeForce 830M
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs Radeon E6760
- Quadro FX 4800 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Quadro FX 4800 vs FirePro S9050
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs FirePro S9050