Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs Radeon R9 M270X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire and Radeon R9 M270X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire and Radeon R9 M270X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R9 M270X
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire here:
Main Specs
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M270X has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M270X is 45 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M270X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M270X is 225 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 177% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Battlefield 5 is 180% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 108% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Cyberpunk 2077 is 39% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Dota 2 is 89% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Fortnite is 133% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Forza Horizon 4 is 225% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Grand Theft Auto V is 124% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Minecraft is 30% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 59% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 177% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 192% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in World of Tanks is 36% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Architecture | Terascale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Blackcomb XT | Venus |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 6 January 2011 | 21 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 1920 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 680 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2x1700 Million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs FirePro S9050
- Radeon R9 M270X vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Radeon R9 M270X vs FirePro S9050
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs Radeon R7 M370
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon R7 M370