Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs Tesla M60
In this comparison between Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire and Tesla M60 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire will be the best choice, for others Tesla M60 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M60
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire here:
Main Specs
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | Tesla M60 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is used in Laptops, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is 123 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 4112 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 73% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 81% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 80% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 68% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 73% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 56% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 93% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 75% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 88% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | Tesla M60 | |
Architecture | Terascale 2 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Blackcomb XT | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 6 January 2011 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 1920 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 680 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2x1700 Million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,833 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |