GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon HD 6970M
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 6970M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 6970M.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon HD 6970M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6970M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6970M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon HD 6970M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 100% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 6970M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon HD 6970M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon HD 6970M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6970M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon HD 6970M - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 620 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6970M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 6970M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 800 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6970M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M in Battlefield 5 is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 6970M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M in Dota 2 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M in Fortnite is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M in World of Tanks is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon HD 6970M | |
Architecture | Fermi | Terascale 2 |
Code name | GF104 | Blackcomb XT |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 6 January 2011 |
Pipelines | 288 | 960 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 680 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 32.64 |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 1,305.6 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | 118 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |