GRID K520 vs Radeon HD 6970M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K520 and Radeon HD 6970M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K520 stacks up against Radeon HD 6970M, check out specs charts below.
GRID K520
Radeon HD 6970M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6970M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6970M here:
Main Specs
GRID K520 | Radeon HD 6970M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 6970M.
- GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 6970M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GRID K520 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 6970M.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6970M - in Laptops.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 6970M - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 65 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6970M.
- GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6970M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 4100 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6970M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 40% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K520 and Radeon HD 6970M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 20% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 40% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 32% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 42% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 34% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 55% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 28% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. |
Full Specs
GRID K520 | Radeon HD 6970M | |
Architecture | Kepler | Terascale 2 |
Code name | GK104 | Blackcomb XT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | 6 January 2011 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 960 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 680 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 32.64 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 1,305.6 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | 118 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |