Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon HD 6970M
When comparing Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon HD 6970M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon HD 6970M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro FX 3800
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon HD 6970M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6970M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6970M here:
Main Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 6970M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 44% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 6970M.
- Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon HD 6970M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon HD 6970M has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6970M - in Laptops.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 6970M - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 6970M is 80 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6970M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 700 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6970M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M in Battlefield 5 is 550% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 103% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M in Dota 2 is 87% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M in Far Cry 5 is 533% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M in Fortnite is 169% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M in Forza Horizon 4 is 366% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M in Grand Theft Auto V is 147% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M in Metro Exodus is 2100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 68% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1000% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | − | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 833% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M in World of Tanks is 67% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 6970M | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Terascale 2 |
Code name | GT200B | Blackcomb XT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 March 2009 | 6 January 2011 |
Pipelines | 192 | 960 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 680 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 32.64 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 1,305.6 gflops |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 118 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |