Quadro T1000 vs Radeon HD 6970M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro T1000 and Radeon HD 6970M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro T1000 and Radeon HD 6970M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro T1000
Radeon HD 6970M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6970M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6970M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro T1000 | Radeon HD 6970M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 6970M has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro T1000.
- Quadro T1000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 6970M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro T1000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6970M - in Laptops.
- Quadro T1000 is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon HD 6970M - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 715 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6970M.
- Quadro T1000 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6970M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 7100 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6970M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 227% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 210% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 49% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 213% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 155% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 157% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro T1000 | Radeon HD 6970M | |
| Architecture | Turing | Terascale 2 |
| Code name | TU117 | Blackcomb XT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 27 May 2019 | 6 January 2011 |
| Pipelines | 960 | |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 680 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.64 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,305.6 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 118 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |