FirePro W7000 vs Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
In this comparison between FirePro W7000 and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W7000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7000
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Power consumption (TDP)
350 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
2x2 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W7000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire.
FirePro W7000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire - in Laptops.
FirePro W7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire - with Terascale 2.
Core clock speed of FirePro W7000 is 235 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire.
FirePro W7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W7000 is 3900 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
21−24
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
21−24
QHD / 1440p
6−7
16−18
4K / 2160p
5−6
10−11
low / 720p
40−45
60−65
medium / 1080p
24−27
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 68% more, than FirePro W7000.
high / 1080p
30−35
55−60
ultra / 1080p
27−30
45−50
QHD / 1440p
12−14
35−40
4K / 2160p
8−9
18−20
low / 720p
65−70
100−110
medium / 1080p
35−40
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Battlefield 5 is 74% more, than FirePro W7000.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro W7000 and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
250−260
medium / 768p
200−210
220−230
ultra / 1080p
120−130
180−190
QHD / 1440p
90−95
110−120
4K / 2160p
50−55
70−75
high / 768p
170−180
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 20% more, than FirePro W7000.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
−
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
FirePro W7000 and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
80−85
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Dota 2 is 10% more, than FirePro W7000.
high / 1080p
24−27
45−50
ultra / 1080p
21−24
40−45
QHD / 1440p
18−20
27−30
4K / 2160p
8−9
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
80−85
medium / 1080p
27−30
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Far Cry 5 is 65% more, than FirePro W7000.
high / 1080p
30−35
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
45−50
QHD / 1440p
16−18
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
120−130
180−190
medium / 1080p
70−75
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Fortnite is 61% more, than FirePro W7000.
high / 1080p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
27−30
45−50
QHD / 1440p
14−16
30−35
4K / 2160p
12−14
24−27
low / 720p
70−75
100−110
medium / 1080p
40−45
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Forza Horizon 4 is 64% more, than FirePro W7000.
low / 768p
100−110
140−150
medium / 768p
95−100
120−130
high / 1080p
40−45
70−75
ultra / 1080p
16−18
30−35
QHD / 1440p
7−8
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Grand Theft Auto V is 49% more, than FirePro W7000.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−11
20−22
QHD / 1440p
10−11
16−18
4K / 2160p
3−4
8−9
low / 720p
40−45
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than FirePro W7000.
low / 768p
120−130
130−140
medium / 1080p
110−120
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Minecraft is 8% more, than FirePro W7000.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than FirePro W7000.
high / 1080p
16−18
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−11
16−18
QHD / 1440p
2−3
10−11
4K / 2160p
1−2
7−8
low / 720p
40−45
65−70
medium / 1080p
21−24
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than FirePro W7000.
low / 768p
75−80
130−140
medium / 768p
45−50
85−90
high / 1080p
24−27
45−50
ultra / 1080p
14−16
24−27
4K / 2160p
8−9
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 82% more, than FirePro W7000.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
50−55
high / 768p
55−60
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in World of Tanks is 6% more, than FirePro W7000.
Full Specs
FirePro W7000
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Terascale 2
Code name
Pitcairn
Blackcomb XTX
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
13 June 2012
12 July 2011
Pipelines
1280
2240
Core clock speed
950 MHz
715 MHz
Transistor count
2,800 million
2x1700 Million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
76.00
Floating-point performance
2,432 gflops
Length
242 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
4800 MHz
900 MHz
Memory bandwidth
153.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
285 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
6 Mh/s
Form factor
full height / full length
StereoOutput3D
+
DisplayPort count
4
Dual-link DVI support
+
Check Price
Check Price