GRID K160Q vs Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
In this comparison between GRID K160Q and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K160Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K160Q
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire here:
Main Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2x2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire - in Laptops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 135 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire.
- GRID K160Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K160Q is 882 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 940% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Battlefield 5 is 1675% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K160Q and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 245% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| GRID K160Q and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Dota 2 is 187% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Far Cry 5 is 1525% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Fortnite is 552% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Forza Horizon 4 is 1128% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Grand Theft Auto V is 291% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Minecraft is 55% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6600% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2933% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in World of Tanks is 97% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K160Q | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Terascale 2 |
| Code name | GK107 | Blackcomb XTX |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 12 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 2240 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 715 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 2x1700 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |