Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro CX and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro CX stacks up against Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire, check out specs charts below.
Quadro CX
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire here:
Main Specs
Quadro CX | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 2x2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- Quadro CX has 1534 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire.
- Quadro CX is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire - in Laptops.
- Quadro CX is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is 113 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
- Quadro CX is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro CX is 700 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 840% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro CX and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
Quadro CX and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Dota 2 is 150% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Fortnite is 526% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Forza Horizon 4 is 875% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 8−9 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 7−8 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1360% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Quadro CX. |
Full Specs
Quadro CX | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Terascale 2 |
Code name | GT200B | Blackcomb XTX |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 11 November 2008 | 12 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 192 | 2240 |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 715 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 2x1700 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire vs GeForce GT 645M
- Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GTX 760
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7950
- Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire vs GeForce GTX 760
- Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire vs Radeon HD 7950