GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 6990M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon HD 6990M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon HD 6990M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 295
Radeon HD 6990M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6990M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6990M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon HD 6990M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 189% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 6990M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon HD 6990M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 6990M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6990M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 6990M - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 527 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6990M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6990M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 99 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6990M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M in Battlefield 5 is 172% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon HD 6990M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M in Dota 2 is 65% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M in Far Cry 5 is 185% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M in Fortnite is 118% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M in Minecraft is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 137% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M in World of Tanks is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon HD 6990M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Terascale 2 |
| Code name | GT200B | Blackcomb XTX |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 12 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 1120 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 715 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 40.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 1,601.6 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |