Radeon HD 6990M vs Tesla C2070
When choosing between Radeon HD 6990M and Tesla C2070, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon HD 6990M and Tesla C2070.
Tesla C2070
Radeon HD 6990M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6990M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6990M here:
Main Specs
| Radeon HD 6990M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 138% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 6990M.
- Radeon HD 6990M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 6990M.
- Radeon HD 6990M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 6990M is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 6990M is 141 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Radeon HD 6990M and Tesla C2070 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 2088 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6990M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 13% more, than Radeon HD 6990M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 19% more, than Radeon HD 6990M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 6990M. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Radeon HD 6990M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than Radeon HD 6990M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Radeon HD 6990M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 15% more, than Radeon HD 6990M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 9% more, than Radeon HD 6990M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 15% more, than Radeon HD 6990M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than Radeon HD 6990M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 8% more, than Radeon HD 6990M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon HD 6990M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than Radeon HD 6990M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than Radeon HD 6990M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| Radeon HD 6990M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon HD 6990M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | Fermi |
| Code name | Blackcomb XTX | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 July 2011 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1120 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,700 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 40.04 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,601.6 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |