GeForce MX110 vs Radeon HD 7670A
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce MX110 and Radeon HD 7670A, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce MX110 stacks up against Radeon HD 7670A, check out specs charts below.
Radeon HD 7670A
GeForce MX110 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX110 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX110 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX110 | Radeon HD 7670A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5/DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 7670A has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce MX110.
- GeForce MX110 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 7670A uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce MX110 has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- GeForce MX110 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 7670A - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX110 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon HD 7670A - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX110 is 365 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- GeForce MX110 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7670A - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 7670A is 2200 MHz higher, than GeForce MX110.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Battlefield 5 is 77% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 17% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7670A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Dota 2 is 11% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Fortnite is 42% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Forza Horizon 4 is 88% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX110 | Radeon HD 7670A | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | N16V-GMR1 | Turks |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 January 2018 | 5 January 2012 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 716 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 14.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |