GeForce MX230 vs Radeon HD 7670A
In this comparison between GeForce MX230 and Radeon HD 7670A you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX230 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 7670A will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 7670A
GeForce MX230 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX230 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX230 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX230 | Radeon HD 7670A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 7670A has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce MX230.
- GeForce MX230 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 7670A uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce MX230 has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- GeForce MX230 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 7670A - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX230 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon HD 7670A - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX230 is 919 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- GeForce MX230 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7670A - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX230 is 3000 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7670A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce MX230 and Radeon HD 7670A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7670A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Dota 2 is 37% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Fortnite is 78% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Forza Horizon 4 is 166% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Minecraft is 15% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 185% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX230 | Radeon HD 7670A | |
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | N17S-G0 | Turks |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 20 February 2019 | 5 January 2012 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 1519 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 716 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.31 | 14.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |