GeForce MX450 vs Radeon HD 7670A
In this comparison between GeForce MX450 and Radeon HD 7670A you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX450 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 7670A will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 7670A
GeForce MX450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX450 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX450 | Radeon HD 7670A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5,GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce MX450 has 11% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- GeForce MX450 is connected by PCIe 4.0 x4, and Radeon HD 7670A uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce MX450 has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- GeForce MX450 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 7670A - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX450 is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon HD 7670A - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 795 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- GeForce MX450 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7670A - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 6002 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7670A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 111% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Dota 2 is 90% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Far Cry 5 is 460% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Fortnite is 200% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Forza Horizon 4 is 366% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Grand Theft Auto V is 177% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 320% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 414% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. |
Full Specs
GeForce MX450 | Radeon HD 7670A | |
Architecture | Turing | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | Turks |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 August 2020 | 5 January 2012 |
Pipelines | 896 | 480 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 600 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 716 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 14.40 |
Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |