Iris Graphics 6100 vs Radeon HD 7670A
In this comparison between Iris Graphics 6100 and Radeon HD 7670A you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Graphics 6100 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 7670A will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 7670A
Iris Graphics 6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 6100 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Graphics 6100 | Radeon HD 7670A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 7670A has 200% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Radeon HD 7670A uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 7670A - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Radeon HD 7670A - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 7670A is 300 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7670A - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7670A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7670A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7670A in Dota 2 is 6% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Far Cry 5 is 40% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Fortnite is 15% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 44% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| Iris Graphics 6100 and Radeon HD 7670A have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7670A in Minecraft is 2% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| Iris Graphics 6100 and Radeon HD 7670A have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Graphics 6100 | Radeon HD 7670A | |
| Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Broadwell GT3 | Turks |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 January 2015 | 5 January 2012 |
| Pipelines | 48 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 716 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 14.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |