Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon HD 7670A
When comparing Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon HD 7670A, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon HD 7670A is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon HD 7670A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Radeon HD 7670A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 7670A has 200% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon HD 7670A uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 31 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 7670A - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon HD 7670A - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 7670A is 300 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7670A - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Battlefield 5 is 111% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 33% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7670A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Far Cry 5 is 160% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 63% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 61% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 157% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 24% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Radeon HD 7670A | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Turks |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 3 January 2017 | 5 January 2012 |
Pipelines | 48 | 480 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 600 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 716 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 55.20 | 14.40 |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | N/A |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon R9 M385X
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs GeForce GTX 650
- Radeon HD 7670A vs Radeon R9 M385X
- Radeon HD 7670A vs GeForce GTX 650
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon HD 6750
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs GeForce GTX 850A
- Radeon HD 7670A vs Radeon HD 6750
- Radeon HD 7670A vs GeForce GTX 850A