Quadro 5000M vs Radeon HD 7670A
When choosing between Quadro 5000M and Radeon HD 7670A, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro 5000M and Radeon HD 7670A.
Radeon HD 7670A
Quadro 5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 5000M | Radeon HD 7670A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 5000M has 122% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- Quadro 5000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon HD 7670A uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro 5000M has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- Quadro 5000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 7670A - in Desktops.
- Quadro 5000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon HD 7670A - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 7670A is 195 MHz higher, than Quadro 5000M.
- Quadro 5000M and Radeon HD 7670A are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 7670A is 2800 MHz higher, than Quadro 5000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro 5000M and Radeon HD 7670A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7670A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Far Cry 5 is 220% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Fortnite is 94% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 177% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Minecraft is 15% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 185% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 5000M | Radeon HD 7670A | |
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Fermi | Turks |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 July 2010 | 5 January 2012 |
| Pipelines | 320 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 405 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 716 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 16.20 | 14.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 518.4 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |