Quadro M1000M vs Radeon HD 7670A
In this comparison between Quadro M1000M and Radeon HD 7670A you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M1000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 7670A will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 7670A
Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M1000M | Radeon HD 7670A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB/4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 7670A has 12% more power consumption, than Quadro M1000M.
- Both video cards are using MXM-A (3.0) interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro M1000M has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- Quadro M1000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 7670A - in Desktops.
- Quadro M1000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon HD 7670A - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 393 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- Quadro M1000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7670A - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 1000 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7670A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Battlefield 5 is 277% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro M1000M and Radeon HD 7670A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 95% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
Quadro M1000M and Radeon HD 7670A have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Dota 2 is 82% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Far Cry 5 is 380% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Fortnite is 175% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 288% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Minecraft is 27% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 280% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in World of Tanks is 56% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. |
Full Specs
Quadro M1000M | Radeon HD 7670A | |
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GM107 | Turks |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 5 January 2012 |
Pipelines | 512 | 480 |
Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 600 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1072 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 716 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.78 | 14.40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,017 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.22 kh/s | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |