Quadro M1200 vs Radeon HD 7670A
In this comparison between Quadro M1200 and Radeon HD 7670A you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M1200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 7670A will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 7670A
Quadro M1200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1200 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M1200 | Radeon HD 7670A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 45 Watt.
- Quadro M1200 has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- Quadro M1200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 7670A - in Desktops.
- Quadro M1200 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon HD 7670A - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1200 is 391 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- Quadro M1200 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7670A - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M1200 is 1000 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7670A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 119% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Dota 2 is 94% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Far Cry 5 is 480% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Fortnite is 212% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 388% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 177% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 360% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 414% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M1200 | Radeon HD 7670A | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | N17P-Q1 | Turks |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 January 2017 | 5 January 2012 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 991 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1870 Million | 716 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 14.40 | |
| Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |