Radeon HD 7670A vs Radeon R9 M280X
When choosing between Radeon HD 7670A and Radeon R9 M280X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon HD 7670A and Radeon R9 M280X.
Radeon HD 7670A
Radeon R9 M280X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M280X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M280X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon HD 7670A | Radeon R9 M280X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | Not Listed |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 7670A is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 M280X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 7670A is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M280X - in Laptops.
- Radeon HD 7670A is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon R9 M280X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M280X is 300 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- Radeon HD 7670A is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M280X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7670A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 7% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7670A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7670A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| Radeon HD 7670A and Radeon R9 M280X have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Far Cry 5 is 20% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Fortnite is 6% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7670A in Minecraft is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| Radeon HD 7670A and Radeon R9 M280X have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 28% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7670A in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon HD 7670A | Radeon R9 M280X | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN |
| Code name | Turks | Saturn XT |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 5 January 2012 | 1 February 2015 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 14.40 | 61.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | 1,792 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | Not Listed | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |