Radeon HD 7670A vs Radeon R9 M395X
When choosing between Radeon HD 7670A and Radeon R9 M395X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon HD 7670A and Radeon R9 M395X.
Radeon HD 7670A
Radeon R9 M395X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395X here:
Main Specs
Radeon HD 7670A | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M395X has 455% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- Radeon HD 7670A is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 M395X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M395X has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- Radeon HD 7670A is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395X - in Laptops.
- Radeon HD 7670A is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon R9 M395X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M395X is 123 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- Radeon HD 7670A is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M395X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 7670A is 2750 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 483% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Battlefield 5 is 477% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 153% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7670A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Dota 2 is 113% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Far Cry 5 is 680% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Fortnite is 300% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Forza Horizon 4 is 533% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Grand Theft Auto V is 250% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Metro Exodus is 866% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Minecraft is 30% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 111% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 9−10 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 600% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in World of Tanks is 58% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 7670A | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 3 |
Code name | Turks | Amethyst XT |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 5 January 2012 | 16 October 2014 |
Pipelines | 480 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 723 MHz |
Transistor count | 716 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 14.40 | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 413 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
TrueAudio | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |