Radeon HD 7670A vs Radeon R9 M485X
When choosing between Radeon HD 7670A and Radeon R9 M485X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon HD 7670A and Radeon R9 M485X.
Radeon HD 7670A
Radeon R9 M485X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M485X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M485X here:
Main Specs
Radeon HD 7670A | Radeon R9 M485X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M485X has 455% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- Radeon HD 7670A is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 M485X uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon R9 M485X has 7 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- Radeon HD 7670A is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M485X - in Laptops.
- Radeon HD 7670A is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon R9 M485X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M485X is 123 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- Radeon HD 7670A is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M485X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M485X is 1000 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7670A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 483% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Battlefield 5 is 500% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 159% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7670A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Dota 2 is 115% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Far Cry 5 is 680% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Fortnite is 306% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Forza Horizon 4 is 533% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Grand Theft Auto V is 250% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Metro Exodus is 866% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Minecraft is 30% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 111% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 9−10 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 614% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in World of Tanks is 58% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 7670A | Radeon R9 M485X | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 3 |
Code name | Turks | Amethyst |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 5 January 2012 | 14 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 480 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 723 MHz |
Transistor count | 716 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 14.40 | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |