FirePro S7000 vs Radeon HD 7690M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S7000 and Radeon HD 7690M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S7000 and Radeon HD 7690M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S7000
Radeon HD 7690M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7690M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7690M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Radeon HD 7690M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5/DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 1650% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7690M.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 7690M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S7000 has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7690M.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7690M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 7690M - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 350 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7690M.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7690M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 1200 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7690M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 411% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S7000 and Radeon HD 7690M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 142% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 118% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 625% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 243% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 414% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 205% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 733% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 33% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 600% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 61% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Radeon HD 7690M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Terascale 2 |
| Code name | Pitcairn | Thames XT / XTX |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 | 7 June 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 725 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 716 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 17.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 696.0 gflops |
| Length | 292 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 3600/1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |