FirePro V5800 vs Radeon HD 7690M
In this comparison between FirePro V5800 and Radeon HD 7690M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5800 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 7690M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro V5800
Radeon HD 7690M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7690M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7690M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Radeon HD 7690M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5/DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 has 270% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7690M.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon HD 7690M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FirePro V5800 and Radeon HD 7690M have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7690M - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon HD 7690M - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 90 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7690M.
- FirePro V5800 and Radeon HD 7690M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 400 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7690M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Battlefield 5 is 55% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro V5800 and Radeon HD 7690M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7690M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Fortnite is 36% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 83% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 85% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Radeon HD 7690M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Terascale 2 |
| Code name | Juniper | Thames XT / XTX |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 7 June 2011 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 725 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 716 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 17.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 696.0 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 3600/1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |