FirePro W8100 vs Radeon HD 7690M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W8100 and Radeon HD 7690M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W8100 and Radeon HD 7690M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro W8100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon HD 7690M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7690M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7690M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W8100 | Radeon HD 7690M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 20 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5/DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 1000% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7690M.
- FirePro W8100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 7690M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FirePro W8100 has 7 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7690M.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7690M - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 7690M - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 224 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7690M.
- FirePro W8100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7690M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 1400 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7690M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 711% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W8100 and Radeon HD 7690M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 190% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 134% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 443% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 44% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W8100 | Radeon HD 7690M | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Terascale 2 |
Code name | Hawaii | Thames XT / XTX |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2014 | 7 June 2011 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 480 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 600 MHz |
Boost Clock | 725 MHz | |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 716 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 17.40 |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 696.0 gflops |
Length | 279 mm | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3600/1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |