GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon HD 7690M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon HD 7690M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon HD 7690M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon HD 7690M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon HD 7690M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q or Radeon HD 7690M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
Radeon HD 7690M
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
20 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR5/DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
1 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q has 150% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7690M.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 7690M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7690M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon HD 7690M - with Terascale 2.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 435 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7690M.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7690M - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 6400 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7690M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
2−3
ultra / 1080p
21−24
0−1
QHD / 1440p
16−18
0−1
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
12−14
medium / 1080p
40−45
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Radeon HD 7690M.
high / 1080p
55−60
−
ultra / 1080p
45−50
5−6
QHD / 1440p
35−40
0−1
4K / 2160p
18−20
−
low / 720p
100−110
14−16
medium / 1080p
60−65
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than Radeon HD 7690M.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon HD 7690M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
120−130
medium / 768p
220−230
90−95
ultra / 1080p
180−190
40−45
QHD / 1440p
110−120
21−24
4K / 2160p
70−75
16−18
high / 768p
210−220
65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 190% more, than Radeon HD 7690M.
low / 768p
60−65
65−70
ultra / 1080p
−
20−22
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon HD 7690M.
low / 768p
120−130
75−80
medium / 768p
110−120
45−50
ultra / 1080p
100−110
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Dota 2 is 134% more, than Radeon HD 7690M.
high / 1080p
45−50
2−3
ultra / 1080p
40−45
2−3
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
14−16
2−3
low / 720p
80−85
10−12
medium / 1080p
45−50
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Radeon HD 7690M.
high / 1080p
60−65
10−11
ultra / 1080p
45−50
5−6
QHD / 1440p
27−30
3−4
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
50−55
medium / 1080p
110−120
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Fortnite is 443% more, than Radeon HD 7690M.
high / 1080p
60−65
5−6
ultra / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
30−35
3−4
4K / 2160p
24−27
2−3
low / 720p
100−110
18−20
medium / 1080p
65−70
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than Radeon HD 7690M.
low / 768p
140−150
45−50
medium / 768p
120−130
−
high / 1080p
70−75
4−5
ultra / 1080p
30−35
2−3
QHD / 1440p
21−24
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Radeon HD 7690M.
high / 1080p
24−27
2−3
ultra / 1080p
20−22
0−1
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
0−1
low / 720p
65−70
4−5
medium / 1080p
30−35
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon HD 7690M.
low / 768p
130−140
90−95
high / 1080p
−
80−85
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
medium / 1080p
120−130
85−90
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Minecraft is 44% more, than Radeon HD 7690M.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
100−110
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon HD 7690M.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
−
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
6−7
medium / 1080p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than Radeon HD 7690M.
low / 768p
130−140
10−11
medium / 768p
85−90
8−9
high / 1080p
45−50
4−5
ultra / 1080p
24−27
4−5
4K / 2160p
16−18
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than Radeon HD 7690M.
low / 768p
90−95
70−75
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
50−55
14−16
high / 768p
60−65
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Radeon HD 7690M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
Radeon HD 7690M
Architecture
Turing
Terascale 2
Code name
N18P-G62 Max-Q
Thames XT / XTX
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
2 April 2020
7 June 2011
Pipelines
1024
480
Core clock speed
1035 MHz
600 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
725 MHz
Transistor count
4,700 million
716 million
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
76.80
17.40
Floating-point performance
696.0 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
10000 MHz
3600/1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.5
5.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.4
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.140
N/A
CUDA
7.5
Laptop size
medium sized
medium sized
Check Price
Check Price
