GRID M60 2Q vs Radeon HD 7690M
In this comparison between GRID M60 2Q and Radeon HD 7690M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M60 2Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 7690M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 2Q
Radeon HD 7690M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7690M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7690M here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 2Q | Radeon HD 7690M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 20 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5/DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 2Q has 1025% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7690M.
- GRID M60 2Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 7690M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GRID M60 2Q has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7690M.
- GRID M60 2Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7690M - in Laptops.
- GRID M60 2Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 7690M - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 7690M is 43 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
- GRID M60 2Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7690M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 1412 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7690M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID M60 2Q and Radeon HD 7690M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 190% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 134% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 443% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 44% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 2Q | Radeon HD 7690M | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Terascale 2 |
Code name | GM204 | Thames XT / XTX |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 7 June 2011 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 480 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 600 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 725 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 716 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 17.40 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 696.0 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 3600/1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |