GRID M60 8Q vs Radeon HD 7690M
When comparing GRID M60 8Q and Radeon HD 7690M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M60 8Q and Radeon HD 7690M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M60 8Q
Radeon HD 7690M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7690M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7690M here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Radeon HD 7690M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 20 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5/DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 1025% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7690M.
- GRID M60 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 7690M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GRID M60 8Q has 7 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7690M.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7690M - in Laptops.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 7690M - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 7690M is 43 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7690M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 1412 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7690M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 366% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 388% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID M60 8Q and Radeon HD 7690M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 132% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 108% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 550% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 237% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 357% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 633% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 33% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 560% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 61% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Radeon HD 7690M | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Terascale 2 |
Code name | GM204 | Thames XT / XTX |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 7 June 2011 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 480 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 600 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 725 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 716 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 17.40 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 696.0 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 3600/1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |