P106 090 vs Radeon HD 7690M
In this comparison between P106 090 and Radeon HD 7690M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people P106 090 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 7690M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
P106 090
Radeon HD 7690M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7690M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7690M here:
Main Specs
| P106 090 | Radeon HD 7690M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5/DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- P106 090 has 275% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7690M.
- P106 090 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 7690M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- P106 090 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7690M.
- P106 090 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7690M - in Laptops.
- P106 090 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon HD 7690M - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of P106 090 is 754 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7690M.
- P106 090 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7690M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P106 090 is 4408 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7690M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Battlefield 5 is 266% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7690M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 91% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Dota 2 is 83% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Fortnite is 162% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Forza Horizon 4 is 222% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Grand Theft Auto V is 138% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 380% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in World of Tanks is 64% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
Full Specs
| P106 090 | Radeon HD 7690M | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Terascale 2 |
| Code name | GP106 | Thames XT / XTX |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 31 July 2017 | 7 June 2011 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 716 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 73.49 | 17.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,352 gflops | 696.0 gflops |
| Length | 250 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 3600/1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |