Quadro T1000 vs Radeon HD 7690M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro T1000 and Radeon HD 7690M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro T1000 and Radeon HD 7690M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro T1000
Radeon HD 7690M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7690M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7690M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro T1000 | Radeon HD 7690M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5/DDR3 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro T1000 has 150% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7690M.
- Quadro T1000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 7690M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro T1000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7690M - in Laptops.
- Quadro T1000 is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon HD 7690M - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 795 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7690M.
- Quadro T1000 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7690M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 4400 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7690M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro T1000 and Radeon HD 7690M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 190% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 134% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 443% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 44% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Radeon HD 7690M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro T1000 | Radeon HD 7690M | |
| Architecture | Turing | Terascale 2 |
| Code name | TU117 | Thames XT / XTX |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 27 May 2019 | 7 June 2011 |
| Pipelines | 480 | |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 716 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 3600/1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |