FirePro S7000 vs Radeon HD 7690M XT
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S7000 and Radeon HD 7690M XT, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S7000 stacks up against Radeon HD 7690M XT, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S7000
Radeon HD 7690M XT is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7690M XT is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7690M XT here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | Radeon HD 7690M XT | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 25 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 1300% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 7690M XT uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro S7000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7690M XT - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 7690M XT - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 225 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7690M XT - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 1200 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 420% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 411% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S7000 and Radeon HD 7690M XT have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 138% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 118% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 625% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 243% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 414% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 205% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 733% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 33% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 600% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 61% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | Radeon HD 7690M XT | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Terascale 2 |
Code name | Pitcairn | Thames XTX |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 7 June 2011 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 480 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 725 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 716 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 17.40 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 696.0 gflops |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |