FirePro S9050 vs Radeon HD 7690M XT
When choosing between FirePro S9050 and Radeon HD 7690M XT, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S9050 and Radeon HD 7690M XT.
Radeon HD 7690M XT is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7690M XT is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7690M XT here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9050
Radeon HD 7690M XT
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
25 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
12 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro S9050 has 800% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
FirePro S9050 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 7690M XT uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro S9050 has 10 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
FirePro S9050 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7690M XT - in Laptops.
FirePro S9050 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 7690M XT - with Terascale 2.
Core clock speed of FirePro S9050 is 175 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
FirePro S9050 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7690M XT - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S9050 is 1900 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
2−3
ultra / 1080p
12−14
1−2
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
35−40
12−14
medium / 1080p
24−27
4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 380% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
high / 1080p
30−35
−
ultra / 1080p
27−30
5−6
QHD / 1440p
10−12
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
16−18
medium / 1080p
35−40
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Battlefield 5 is 388% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro S9050 and Radeon HD 7690M XT have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
120−130
medium / 768p
200−210
95−100
ultra / 1080p
110−120
40−45
QHD / 1440p
85−90
21−24
4K / 2160p
45−50
16−18
high / 768p
160−170
65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
low / 768p
60−65
65−70
ultra / 1080p
50−55
20−22
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
low / 768p
120−130
75−80
medium / 768p
100−110
45−50
ultra / 1080p
80−85
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Dota 2 is 112% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
high / 1080p
24−27
2−3
ultra / 1080p
21−24
2−3
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
2−3
low / 720p
50−55
10−12
medium / 1080p
27−30
4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
high / 1080p
30−35
10−11
ultra / 1080p
24−27
5−6
QHD / 1440p
14−16
3−4
low / 720p
120−130
50−55
medium / 1080p
70−75
10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Fortnite is 237% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
high / 1080p
30−35
5−6
ultra / 1080p
24−27
−
QHD / 1440p
12−14
3−4
4K / 2160p
12−14
2−3
low / 720p
65−70
18−20
medium / 1080p
35−40
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 357% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
low / 768p
100−110
45−50
medium / 768p
90−95
−
high / 1080p
40−45
4−5
ultra / 1080p
16−18
2−3
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
high / 1080p
12−14
2−3
ultra / 1080p
10−11
0−1
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
4−5
medium / 1080p
16−18
3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
low / 768p
120−130
90−95
high / 1080p
−
80−85
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
medium / 1080p
110−120
85−90
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Minecraft is 33% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
70−75
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
QHD / 1440p
1−2
−
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
35−40
6−7
medium / 1080p
20−22
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
low / 768p
70−75
10−11
medium / 768p
45−50
8−9
high / 1080p
24−27
4−5
ultra / 1080p
14−16
4−5
4K / 2160p
8−9
1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 560% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
low / 768p
90−95
70−75
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
40−45
14−16
high / 768p
55−60
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in World of Tanks is 61% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
Full Specs
FirePro S9050
Radeon HD 7690M XT
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Terascale 2
Code name
Tahiti
Thames XTX
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
7 August 2014
7 June 2011
Pipelines
1792
480
Core clock speed
900 MHz
725 MHz
Transistor count
4,313 million
716 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
100.8
17.40
Floating-point performance
3,226 gflops
696.0 gflops
Length
254 mm
Memory bus width
384 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5500 MHz
3600 MHz
Memory bandwidth
264 GB/s
57.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.4
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Laptop size
medium sized
Form factor
full height / full length
Check Price
Check Price
