FireStream 9370 vs Radeon HD 7690M XT
In this comparison between FireStream 9370 and Radeon HD 7690M XT you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9370 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 7690M XT will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9370
Radeon HD 7690M XT is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7690M XT is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7690M XT here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | Radeon HD 7690M XT | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 25 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 800% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7690M XT - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon HD 7690M XT - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 100 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
- FireStream 9370 and Radeon HD 7690M XT are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 1000 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 220% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 222% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7690M XT in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 69% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 325% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 137% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 177% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 105% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 21% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | Radeon HD 7690M XT | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Terascale 2 |
Code name | Cypress | Thames XTX |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 7 June 2011 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 480 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 725 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 716 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 17.40 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 696.0 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- Radeon HD 7690M XT vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- Radeon HD 7690M XT vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs HD Graphics 5000
- FireStream 9370 vs FirePro M4150
- Radeon HD 7690M XT vs HD Graphics 5000
- Radeon HD 7690M XT vs FirePro M4150