GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon HD 7690M XT
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon HD 7690M XT. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon HD 7690M XT. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 280
Radeon HD 7690M XT is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7690M XT is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7690M XT here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon HD 7690M XT | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 844% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon HD 7690M XT has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7690M XT - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 7690M XT - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 571 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7690M XT - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 7690M XT is 2493 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon HD 7690M XT have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon HD 7690M XT have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7690M XT in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7690M XT in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7690M XT in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon HD 7690M XT have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7690M XT in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7690M XT in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon HD 7690M XT have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Minecraft is 3% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon HD 7690M XT have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon HD 7690M XT have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon HD 7690M XT have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon HD 7690M XT | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Terascale 2 |
| Code name | GT200 | Thames XTX |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 7 June 2011 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 716 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 17.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 696.0 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |